Wild horses in the American West are facing a critical situation as their numbers grow beyond manageable levels. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is under scrutiny for its methods of managing these iconic animals. Advocates are calling for more humane solutions to ensure the well-being of wild horses and burros.
CAÑON CITY, Colo. — The herd of wild horses clopped cautiously toward the strangers in their pen. A chestnut mustang leaned in for a closer look, sniffing and snorting curiously. Another inched backward, her black eyes flashing with fear.
For many, this would be their first human contact, beyond the workers who feed them at this 80-acre holding center, 100 miles southwest of Denver.
“They have all their needs met here. Except their freedom,” said Fran Ackley, who oversees the Bureau of Land Management’s Wild Horse and Burro Program in Colorado. “I can’t say if they want it or not.”
Long a totem of the American frontier, the tens of thousands of wild horses who roam across forgotten stretches of the rural West are at the heart of an increasingly tense dispute over their fate. The bureau says their numbers continue to grow at an unmanageable rate, despite years of removing wild horses from the range to enclosed pastures so that wildlife and livestock can share the land.
Horse advocates contend that the government’s approach has not only failed, but is also needlessly cruel. And they say the horses should be able to live out their lives freely.
Despite deep differences on how the animals should be managed, both sides agree on one thing: The situation has reached a tipping point.
These days, the temporary holding pens and long-term pastures where many wild horses end up are nearing capacity or full. And the cost of caring for them has ballooned over the past decade.
“We’re looking at critical mass,” said Tom Gorey, a spokesman for the bureau. “The fact is we can’t be in a position of gathering horses that we can’t take care of. The capacity issue is staring us in the face.”
The question of what to do with the animals — descendants of United States Cavalry horses, workhorses, and horses brought here by Spanish settlers — has confounded the federal government for decades.
In an effort to maintain a stable population while also preserving public land, Congress passed the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971, allowing the bureau to remove “excess” wild horses from the range.
But with virtually no natural predators, herds typically double every four years. Currently, about 37,300 wild horses and burros roam across federal rangeland in 10 Western states, about 11,000 more than what the bureau deems manageable.
Each year, the bureau conducts roundups to thin the population. Low-flying helicopters drive the animals into traps before they are taken to holding pens and permanent pastures.
The roundups have long been criticized as inhumane and dangerous.
“Their entire approach is wrong. The B.L.M. puts all its emphasis on removing and stockpiling horses as opposed to managing them on the range,” said Suzanne Roy, director of the American Wild Horse Conservation (formerly American Wild Horse Preservation). “There needs to be a more humane way, a more cost-effective way of managing these animals.”
Photos taken by advocates of a recent roundup in northern Nevada appear to show several confused horses stumbling into a barbed wire fence. Another shows a wrangler with a foal slung across his saddle. Advocates said the animal collapsed after being stampeded for miles.
While acknowledging that a small number of horses get hurt or die during the roundups, the bureau defends the approach as the only option given the circumstances. Mr. Gorey said that the agency does everything it can to minimize injuries.
But the bureau concedes that gathering more horses is not a panacea. Nearly 50,000 wild horses and burros are already housed at temporary holding pens or pastures, more than triple the number from a decade ago.
“People need to realize that we’ve done more than what was envisioned under the Wild Horses Act, which is why we’re in the situation we are today,” said Mr. Ackley, the head of the bureau’s Colorado program.
He noted that horses at the Cañon City facility are well cared for, whereas drought and wintry conditions can make life on the range especially harsh. A prison inmate training program at the center will also ready some of the mustangs for adoption.
But advocates say that the trauma of being separated from their families and the range leaves the horses dispirited and stressed.
This month, a strange illness sickened horses at Cañon City, and 19 died or were euthanized. Mr. Ackley said he had never seen anything like it.
Arguments about whether the holding pens or long-term pastures are acceptable homes may be moot. With a steep decline in adoptions and waning interest from buyers — because of the soaring price of hay — there is little room to care for any more.
Driven largely by what it costs to hold the animals, the program’s budget has risen to $75 million this year from about $20.4 million in 2000.
“This is one of the most difficult and vexing problems that we face in managing public lands,” Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said. “It is one that does not have an easy answer.”
Mr. Salazar said some progress had been made in finding a solution, noting that the bureau was using fertility-control drugs on mares, which advocacy groups favor, and looking into developing sanctuaries where more horses can live.
In recent months, though, horse advocates have ratcheted up criticism of Mr. Salazar and the bureau, after the news organization ProPublica reported that the bureau had sold 1,777 wild horses to a Colorado livestock hauler, Tom Davis, a proponent of horse slaughtering.
The Interior Department’s inspector general is investigating whether Mr. Davis sold the horses over the Mexican border for slaughter. The United States’ last horse slaughterhouse closed in 2007, and buyers must agree not to sell wild horses to be killed.
Mr. Salazar said several safeguards were recently put in place to ensure wild horses are kept safe after sale.
In the meantime, horse advocates like Carol Walker view the bureau’s long-term strategy as untenable. On a recent morning, Ms. Walker watched as three mustangs meandered around her rolling property near Denver.
Ms. Walker adopted the wild horses from the bureau for $125 each, the going rate, and had them trained. Her youngest horse, Mica, comes from a Wyoming herd that is the focus of a legal battle between a local grazing association, which wants the herd removed to protect livestock forage, and horse advocates.
Ms. Walker ruffled Mica’s mane as he nuzzled his nose against her neck.
“Seeing these horses out in the wild and then seeing them in a holding pen, it will break your heart,” she said. “I’d rather they be free than live with me.”
Originally Posted By The New York Times