Wild Horse Advocates Clash Over Management Plan

April 24, 2019

Wild horse advocates are divided over a new management plan proposed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The plan, supported by some welfare advocates and ranching organizations, aims to manage wild horses on public lands through non-lethal methods. However, others argue that it could harm the mustangs more than help them.

Background on Wild Horse Protection

The Roaming Wild Horse and Burro Act of 1971 protected wild horses and burros, placing them under BLM protection. Currently, more than 80,000 wild horses reside on Herd Management Areas (HMA) across 13 western states, including Arizona, California, Colorado, and others. Additionally, nearly 37,000 horses roam grasslands in long-term pastures, primarily in Kansas and Oklahoma, while around 12,000 are in short-term holding corrals.

Concerns from Ranching Organizations

Ranching organizations have expressed concerns that mustangs and burros compete with domestic livestock for grazing lands. Nancy Perry, senior vice president of ASPCA Government Relations, noted that the BLM lacks on-range management strategies but plans to continue removals.

Proposed Management Strategies

With herd sizes potentially doubling every four years, the BLM and some welfare organizations have explored ways to control growth without selling horses for processing. Population control measures include the use of immunocontraceptive Porcine Zona Pellucida (PZP) and investigating surgical sterilization of mares.

Support for Non-Lethal Management

On April 22, the ASPCA, along with Return to Freedom, the National Cattlemans Beef Association, and other stakeholders, announced support for a non-lethal management plan. This plan advocates for a robust fertility control program, strategic gathers, and increased adoptions to reduce costs and ensure the sustainability of horse populations.

Criticism and Opposition

Despite the support, the plan has faced criticism. The American Wild Horse Conservation (formerly American Wild Horse Campaign) opposes the plan, stating it is an irresponsible sellout of America's wild horses. Marty Irby, executive director at Animal Wellness Action, called the proposal naive, emphasizing the historical significance of horses in America.

No one from the BLM was available for comment.

Originally posted by Horse Welfare News