Domestic Horse Slaughter Ban Continues

U.S. Continues Ban on Horse SlaughterU.S. Continues Ban on Horse Slaughter

With the signing of a $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill by President Obama, the United States continues to prohibit the domestic slaughter of horses for human consumption. This legislation specifically bans the use of federal funding for inspections at such facilities, thereby maintaining the de facto ban on domestic horse slaughter. This move not only saves taxpayer dollars but also prevents efforts in at least three states to initiate horse slaughter for export to foreign nations.

Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States, stated, “Time and again, the North American horse slaughter industry has proved itself to be reckless when it comes to matters of food safety and animal welfare. Americans do not eat horses, nor do they want them suffering in long-distance transport and in inhumane slaughter plants so they can end up on a foreign dinner plate.”

Earlier this month, the European Commission decided to suspend horsemeat imports from Mexico due to food safety concerns. U.S. horses account for 87 percent of the horses slaughtered in Mexico for export to the EU and are regularly administered drugs and other substances over the course of their lives that are potentially toxic to humans. A recent audit conducted by the EU also noted issues with inhumane treatment of American horses in holding pens on U.S. soil and during transport to slaughter.

The Humane Society of the United States and Humane Society Legislative Fund now call on Congress to pass legislation to ban horse slaughter outright, including the export of American horses for slaughter abroad.

The omnibus spending bill included strong fund levels for enforcement of animal welfare and anti-wildlife trafficking programs, as well as helpful provisions to encourage more humane management of wild horses on public lands, development of alternatives to animal testing, and updated regulations on treatment of captive marine mammals. However, it also contained adverse provisions to benefit the gun lobby (restrictions on regulating the lead content of ammunition) and the farm lobby (restrictions on regulating greenhouse gas emissions from CAFOs and overseeing the beef check-off program).

Originally Posted By HSUS

5
 min read