BLM’s New Conservation Rule and Its Impact on Wild Horses

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has finalized a new rule that aims to integrate conservation into its currentpublic landsmanagement. However, this rule has sparked debate over its implications for wild horses and burros.

Conservation and Public Lands

The rule states that the “BLMwill protect intact landscapes, restore degraded habitat, and make informed management decisions based on science and data.” To support this goal, the final rule codifies conservation tools to be used in the agency’s Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA) multi-use framework. FLPMA has provided the framework for the federal management ofpublic landssince 1976.

Implications for Wild Horses

This final rule affirms that conservation efforts are on equal footing with other multi-uses across the 245 million acres ofpublic landstheBLMmanages. Sounds great for wild horses, right?

Unfortunately, theBLMdoes not consider wild horse and burro habitat restoration a conservation use. This perpetuates a narrative that sidesteps the crucial role of wild horses and burros in maintaining ecological balance and ignores congressional intent in the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act that states they should be protected and managed as an “integral part of the natural system ofpublic lands.” Instead, the new rule inexplicably considers “managed” commercial livestock grazing a conservation use.

AWHC's Perspective

While American Wild Horse Conservation (formerly American Wild Horse Campaign) is optimistic about new conservation initiatives for our incrediblepublic lands, we are disappointed in theBLM’s continued scapegoating of wild horses for the range degradation caused by commercial livestock grazing onpublic lands. This new rule offered a potential for the BLM to change course and invest in humane, scientific, data-driven conservation initiatives for wild horse habitat restoration, but it seems to have missed the mark.